Archive for the ‘Commentary’ Category

The Fear Formula

April 25th, 2010

According to Wikipedia, fear is an emotional response to a perceived threat.  Fear has the potential to be a significant motivator of human action, in-action, and specific behaviors.

"Take him to the dungeon!"

"Take him to the dungeon!"

In past ages, direct fear imposed by powerful rulers was used to control the masses, control the individual and motivate society to enact the will of the ruler.  The world has never been without such methods being employed.  Basically, the transaction includes a club in the hand of the powerful with the threat of the use of the club as the motivation for the ‘governed’ to comply with the wishes of the ruler.  The prudent tyrannical ruler endeavors to minimize the use of the club. His primary aim is not to harm, but instead to control.  We are all familiar with these processes of the bully, but in the modern era, most of Western civilization dispensed with allowing these methods to be the normal order of society.

In the 17th Century, some among The People, got their act together and developed a concept known as the Social Contract.  This was the introduction into an understanding across society that the authority of the state was derived from the “consent of the governed.”  Thus developed an antithesis of tyranny.

However, there is some feature within human nature that drives some to desire to attempt to be the masters over all the rest.  Observation demonstrates a driving force behind this that is beyond the simple explanation of ambition, self-preservation, or just trying to get ahead. These are factors, but there is one factor that is deeper; there is an element of evil that motivates men to strive to be master over all others.  Therefore, there is always a certain pressure for humanity to be approaching tyranny, a vector that is resisted only by the will of individuals willing to defend the liberty of themselves and of others.

» More: The Fear Formula

Propaganda - An Enemy of Truth

April 18th, 2010

Recently I visited the National Holocaust Museum. I have intended to visit there for quite some time and have been even more interested since the installation of the special exhibit entitled “State of Deception: The Power of Nazi Propaganda.”

deception

The permanent exhibition of the museum is sheer gravitas.  Even when one has significant knowledge of the topic of The Holocaust, the presentations of the museum bring a much greater depth to understanding that when man dispenses with the knowledge of nominal morality, all measures of evil are possible.  Methods of propaganda were among the human designs that caused these things to occur.

A portion of the State of Deception exhibit provided a concise description of the integrated methods of propaganda.  An open-minded viewing of these details validates concerns that these methods continue to be used today to control society and enslave the individual into service of seen and unseen masters.  Recognizing these methods quickly removes the veneer and allows us to see through what is otherwise effective deception.

» More: Propaganda - An Enemy of Truth

We Trained to Resist Marxist Methods

April 8th, 2010

Two decades ago, among many other learning opportunities, I had the distinct pleasure of attending and graduating from a combat survival course run by the U.S. military.  The first part of the course focused on evading capture.  The second part of the course was all about surviving captivity as a prisoner of war.

During the P.O.W portion of the course, we were taught about the methods of control, oppression and exploitation that we might expect to be used against us in a P.O.W. situation.  Further, the successful exploitation of the P.O.W. would then allow the enemy new methods of psychological warfare that could be applied against the American people. As I analyze the situation faced today by freedom-loving Americans, I recognize parallels between the P.O.W. experience and the methods of control being imposed upon us by what we have allowed our government to become.

» More: We Trained to Resist Marxist Methods

Letter to Conservative Congressman

April 4th, 2010

Dear Congressman [XXXXX],

It was certainly a great privilege to meet with you in your office on the morning of March 20th.  Thank you for making time for my impromptu visit, and thank you for the photograph of our meeting.

On that Saturday, with less than 48 hours of notice, nearly 50,000 Americans gathered near the U.S. Capitol to bring attention to the popular resistance to nationalization of the health care industry in our nation.  Certainly, this is only one issue among several where our fundamental liberties are under attack by various factions.  These factions include those who believe that an elitist, centralized control is the proper course for society and also by those who merely follow their greed for power.  Opposing them are those of us who are engaged in a significant and growing liberty movement.

» More: Letter to Conservative Congressman

No Time to be Discouraged

March 22nd, 2010

In an online conversation with a freedom-loving person yesterday morning, and in the context of what we must do in 2010 and 2012 elections, she asked me, “Do you think we’ll make it?” This spurred me to consider how we should think about our days ahead.

Paraphrasing my response to her:

Guessing at what “might be” is not our path. We shall think, act, learn, teach, lead, and pray - follow the course that is right. Led by our conscience we will dedicate our efforts to do good even though we cannot expect a guarantee of any given outcome. The constant battle for liberty holds its risks, but it provides the possibility of freedom. Doing nothing, or giving up hope, guarantees a condition of slavery.

The person to whom I made these comments was encouraged by them, and that is why I share them with you now.

Now, continuing on these thoughts:

At any point in any real fight for life and liberty, it does not matter what we guess to be our chances of success. We should not spend a moment asking ourselves that question. To the ideals that have brought us such a bountiful life, and to our children, their children, our countrymen, and to the decent people of other countries who today live in bondage, we owe our best and complete effort to do the right thing, at each moment, to preserve, restore and secure freedom. The outcome shall always be uncertain, but our determination must be completely certain — merely because, intrinsically it is the good and right thing to do.

I am not attempting to set any kind of expectation of level of activism. We all have our complete and complex lives to lead. However, do what you can, rearrange priorities (as many of you already have), step out of your comfort zone, perhaps meet with others, help them to understand what is at stake, and help them consider ways that they can engage for positive effect.

Prepare for the second front to be opened. That front will be “Amnesty” for illegal immigrants or imposition of economically destructive carbon tax.

Because of Our Love for Them

March 21st, 2010

precious_children

This is a real quick post before departing back to Capitol Hill.

A precious family joined us on The Hill yesterday. They were included in the voices that were heard, voices calling for Freedom and rejecting the chains of tyranny.

The mother of these precious babes was carefully and expertly explaining to them the meaning of all of this; not just of the protest, but of the concept of keeping ‘government’ in check.

More to follow later.

A Day in the Life of A Patriot

March 19th, 2010

At approximately 11:45 a.m., on March 19th 2010, a friend and I were walking between sections of Parking Lot A on the George Mason University Fairfax campus.  We encountered a two-lane street that bisects the parking lot. My friend paused at the near side of the intersection to adjust a load she was carrying and began to cross the street.  Under my arm, I was carrying a non-partisan political sign that I had previously displayed at a rally in opposition to contentious legislation.  At the time of this incident, I was not intentionally or overtly displaying the sign.

At the point where I was crossing the street, there is a narrow divider between the two lanes.  As I crossed the first lane, I noticed a small-size, blue SUV approaching in the second lane.  I stopped near the divider to yield to the vehicle.  After I was stopped in-place near the divider, the driver of the SUV stopped about 15 feet short of my crossing path.  The driver of the SUV then motioned to me to cross in front of his vehicle that was now at a complete stop.  In an expeditious fashion, I began to cross in front of the stopped vehicle.  When I was about two steps into the lane, I heard the engine of SUV rev, the horn sounded, and with my peripheral vision, I sensed the SUV rapidly approaching.  I quickly ran out of the path of the SUV.  As the SUV proceeded beyond me, a man leaned his head out of the open passenger side window and laughed.  I shouted a remark at the man.  The driver and the passenger of the vehicle were both male, in their mid-twenties, and had features indicating they were of Middle-Eastern descent.

» More: A Day in the Life of A Patriot

Into the Mind of “Them”

March 15th, 2010

On Twitter, I recently had an interchange with a person who is representative of Obama’s base, agenda and methods.  Through the exposition of these ideas, the radical and dangerous nature of the Obama agenda again comes into view.

Breathtaking is the readiness of this person to depart from logical progression.  Chilling is his/her (this is merely a patronizing use of PC) dedication to something that he/she describes as being just this side of totalitarianism.  Here, I will recount the interchange.

Admittedly, I apparently provoked the dialog.  Without that, we would not have this opportunity for analysis and insight.

I saw this ObamaPerson (not his/her real Twitter name) posting to some conservative tweeters that I follow.  My comment was a bit of a critique of his/her lack of intellectual integrity.

ObamaPerson responded with:

Calling 52% of voters, 80% of media, & 95% of University Professors uneducated? Really? MSNBC calling us brilliant!

I sent a few replies that included these points: 1) History has many examples of nations being led to ruin by their purported intellectuals; 2) Now that Obama is showing more of his real self, Americans, to include many who voted for him, are rejecting his policies and his methods – I provided a link to the most recent Rasmussen poll; 3) I pointed out that “media” people and most university professors spend little time in the real world of producing things of useful value; 4) Then, to up the ante a bit, I informed ObamaPerson that while he/she is tracking a course toward peril, we Americans will be further preparing to school the ObamaPersons – then I threw in a little question, asking how many viewers tuned into MSNBC last week.

Most of my points went unanswered, but ObamaPerson did key in on the poll data, in a way.  Recall that ObamaPerson began the dialog by citing numbers of Obama supporters from narrow fields (probably dated data as well) — kinda’ looks like “Polling Data” to me.  However, now that I provide current poll numbers, ObamaPerson changes tack and claims that poll numbers are meaningless.  So, intellectual integrity goes out the window when it leads to the “wrong” conclusion.  Still, apparently being proud of his/her conviction, ObamaPerson cuts to the chase. Read this carefully.  Read it three times:

Polls [are] not relevant. People don’t know what is in their best interest. We will Decree health reform if necessary!

» More: Into the Mind of “Them”

Durbin: A Study in Arrogance and Abuse (And a Lesson in Economics Too!)

February 13th, 2010

Yesterday, Dick Durbin took to the floor of the U.S. Senate to berate the people who live and work in Washington, D.C.  Durbin’s purpose was to merely draw attention to… Dick Durbin, by capitalizing on the fact that Federal offices in D.C. were shut down for four days due to back-to-back snow storms.  Unfortunately, these kinds of political gimmicks are effective among the uninformed, those who are not familiar with the details behind the stumping propagandists.  Once upon a time, “journalists” might have exposed the subterfuge, but we all know that will not happen to Democrat Durbin… and this is why we blog.

Most commuters were buried, then plowed in.

Commuters' initial means of transportation were buried, then plowed in.

Durbin’s remarks were obviously tied to the government shutdown, and by commenting on the alleged behaviors and attitudes of individuals, he purposely impugned the character and work ethic of every person who lives in the D.C. Metro Area and is employed by the Federal Government.  Here, you can learn the rest of the story and how the “Liberal” Ass Holes roll.

» More: Durbin: A Study in Arrogance and Abuse (And a Lesson in Economics Too!)

New York Times Dishes Out But Can’t Take

January 30th, 2010

Online at the New York Times is an opinion piece written by Charles Blow. It is basically a puff piece disguised as a criticism of Obama’s inability to talk low enough for the “plain folks” to understand. When dissected, the article is rather offensive toward the American people.

For instance, in closing, and speaking of Obama, Charles writes:

The next time he gives a speech, someone should tap him on the ankle and say, “Mr. President, we’re down here.”

Charles complains that “plain folk” Americans are just too stupid to understand the great and awesome goodness that The One is offering to us. Therefore, we should “tap him on the ankle.” Disgusting.

It looks like my comment submitted to the NYT is just too “abusive” for them to post. Maybe it is the “Omamunism” comment. After all, who am I to have a voice in Obama’s Kingdom.

Here is my submitted post:

—–

Charles, certainly many readers will swoon over your “gallant” attempt at sophistry in the service of a false messiah. Fortunately, now a majority of real Americans will see through the obfuscation.

The State of The Union address did not demonstrate that Obama is “stuck on studious.” Instead, his words (and his arrogant manner) demonstrated that he is “stuck on” his agenda of installing servitude to the state as the main feature of American citizenship. In fact, if he actually did a better job of explaining his true agenda, many more “plain folks” would turn against him, as indeed they should. The American people are not “suspicious of complexity.” Actually, they are becoming resistant to enslavement. Besides, many of the greatest and truly profound ideas of humanity are quite simple.

The health care bill was conceived in such a convoluted fashion exactly for the purpose of hiding its attempt at “overreach,” or perhaps more accurately stated; it was purposefully written in order to hide its fundamental tyranny. The “Republicans” did not attack by “shrouding the bill in a fog of confusion.” The Republican Party had very little to do with the recent defense of liberty. It was the real American people who exposed the bill for what it is. High-speed analysis was conducted by every-day citizens. Then the results of that analysis were quickly communicated across the nation by other every-day people. Yes, this was all accomplished by those plain, non-elites who inhabit fly-over country. It is now seen that they are indeed the most qualified to determine their own destiny. Slavers be damned.

We do not fret over a “political impasse in Washington” when the argument is merely a battle over which form of collective management will be imposed upon those who the elites view as a herd of simpleton humans. Without using the words, most of Washington is engaged in imposing Socialism, Communism, Fascism, or Obamunism upon the American people. The decent, responsible, self-reliant, middle of America has now caught on to the Washington game.

Finally, let us remember that it is actually the community of the Left that routinely reduces political discourse to a series of sound bites and catchy slogans, not to mention deceptive names for their most radical organizations.  However, perhaps we can work toward agreement that some of the most enduring and profound principles of humanity can actually be stated in far fewer than 140 characters. For instance: “You shall not steal.” Wow! Twenty characters, including the spaces and the period. A short, yet widely accepted principle that should disabuse us of any ideas of collectivist social order.

There is no Liberty in Liberalism.